Biden Administration's Role in World War III Concerns

There seems to be a persistent belief that the Biden administration is intentionally poisoning the peace and laying the groundwork for World War III. However, this narrative primarily stems from those who, like myself, have long been agitating for conflict without any meaningful support from the current administration.

The classic reaction to my efforts has been to dismiss them as misguided, arguing that my viewpoints are out of touch with reality. I am not alone in my concerns; many others also share this opinion. Yet, the question remains: if the administration isn't directly causing conflict, could it be that the deep state is?

The True Rulers of America

Indeed, the neoconservatives and Zionists who surrounded Biden during his campaign and transition now have significant influence. They appear to be the true architects of political and military strategy. This group is more interested in maintaining their control and wealth than in the well-being of the American people or global stability.

It's crucial to understand that this is not just a personal opinion. Intelligence and fear-mongering have been key components of many leaders' narratives, including former President Donald Trump. Even if Trump wasn't overtly involved in instigating conflict, his rhetoric could have inadvertently contributed to a tense global environment.

The Deep State and Its Intentions

The deep state refers to a powerful group of individuals and organizations that operate beneath the surface of government. They seek to maintain their influence and control over the political process, often prioritizing their own interests over the interests of the nation. Their actions can be insidious and difficult to trace, which explains why so many people are skeptical of government statements and actions.

They are willing to risk the destruction of America in order to retain their status and power. This flies in the face of patriotism and the welfare of the American people. It's a concerning reality that many are struggling to come to terms with.

The Case Against Assistance to Ukraine

Some argue that we should be more supportive of Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. While humanitarian aid, such as food and medical care, is certainly justifiable, the involvement of American missiles and direct military support is highly questionable. This approach carries significant risks and could indeed escalate the conflict to a much higher level.

We must consider the long-term consequences of such actions. Would the United States expect Ukraine to assist in a similar situation here? It would be foolish to think that other nations would provide support without expecting something in return. Prioritizing the well-being of our own citizens should always be a top concern.

The Need for Realistic Responses

It is important to have realistic and measured responses to global challenges. For example, when North Korea introduced troops, a measured and diplomatic approach is necessary rather than a knee-jerk reaction. The famous line by Neville Chamberlain, "peace for our time," serves as a reminder of the importance of thoughtful and strategic decision-making.

In conclusion, the rhetoric about a looming World War III is often fueled by a lack of trust in our leaders and the deep state. It's crucial to hold elected officials and those in power accountable and to advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes peace and the well-being of our citizens.