Ben Shapiros Momentum: A Composer of Controversy and Reflection

Ben Shapiro's Momentum: A Composer of Controversy and Reflection

Ben Shapiro, a prominent commentator in the conservative sphere, has left a lasting impression on many with his sharp wit and incisive critique. Among his most notable moments, one particularly stands out: reciting the lyrics to 'WAP.' While entertaining, this moment is overshadowed by his profound discussion on the founding of America and the principles behind it. Through this piece, we will explore key moments in Shapiro's career and critically analyze his views on conservatism, especially regarding foreign and domestic policies.

Ben Shapiro's Best Moment: The Founding of America and Decentralized Power

One of the most memorable moments in Ben Shapiro's repertoire, albeit less often referenced, is his insightful tangent on the founding of America. Shapiro delved into the historical context that inspired the founding fathers, emphasizing their understanding of human corruption and the necessity for decentralized power. This discussion touches on essential principles that form the bedrock of classic American conservatism, advocating for liberty and minimal central government interference in personal affairs.

Shapiro's deep dive into historical perspectives highlighted the foresight of many founding fathers. He highlighted the quotes of figures like John Taylor of Caroline, who believed in the inefficacy of a standing army and valued the British tradition of minimal military presence. These insights underscore the founders' prudence in preventing centralized power, a principle that is as relevant today as it was then. Shapiro's reflection beautifully encapsulates the founders' wisdom and the critical ongoing debate about centralized vs. decentralized power.

The Struggle Between Ideals and Practice: Foreign and Domestic Policies

While Shapiro's historical insights are commendable, his own practice has not always aligned with his stated ideals. In comparing his advocacy for nationalism and American interventionism abroad with his statements about the dangers of centralization, a seismic gap becomes apparent. This juxtaposition raises questions about the practical implementation of his principles.

For instance, Shapiro's assertion that a declining empire must retain an active foreign policy contrasts sharply with historical evidence. Empires like Spain and Britain fell not due to inactivity but overextension and overreach. This discrepancy highlights a fundamental issue in his approach: the separation between rhetoric and action.

Consequences of Active Foreign Policy

The link between active foreign policy and domestic policy is a crucial topic. While Shapiro acknowledges the growing national debt, he seems to overlook one of the largest contributors: America's continuous involvement in global conflicts. History provides ample evidence of presidents using foreign wars to justify domestic overreach, as documented by impeachment witnesses and critics alike.

Calvin Coolidge, a true conservative whose works Ben admires, famously recognized that America's role was not to solve the world's problems. Neo-conservatives, including many like Shapiro, erroneously believe that active foreign engagement does not lead to domestic overreach, which is demonstrably false. Over time, foreign wars and interventions provide ample material for presidents to justify expanding federal powers.

The examples of Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, Truman, LBJ, and others demonstrate how wars have been used to expand executive authority and federal reach. Each of these leaders utilized war to consolidate power, showcasing the interplay between domestic and foreign policy.

Conclusion: A Quest for Authentic Conservatism

Ben Shapiro's contributions to the conservative discourse, while often polarizing, are valuable. His critical insights on the founding principles offer a profound reflection on American history. However, he must address the hypocrisy that plagues many in his movement. Until true conservatives like Shapiro recognize the disconnect between their rhetoric and practice, the vision of the founders will continue to elude us.

Related Resources

For further reading and discussion, consider exploring the works of:

Ron Paul Calvin Coolidge's writings on constitutional government Historical analysis of American foreign policy and domestic consequences