Analysis of Unrealistic Elements in the 2016 Assassin's Creed Movie

The 2016 adaptation of Assassin's Creed has garnered both praise and criticism from viewers and gaming enthusiasts alike. While many aspects of the film stay true to the beloved video game series, several elements fall flat. Below, we delve into the most unrealistic parts of the movie, focusing on the hyped-up plot holes and character actions that lack plausibility.

The Gross Incompetence of Abstergo Industries

One of the most glaring issues in the 2016 film is the incompetence of Abstergo Industries (referred to as Abstergo in the original gaming series). The company's failure to secure its premises is astounding, presenting a significant threat to the intellectual property and personal safety of those involved. The following are some of the most egregious oversights:

Unsecured Prisoners

Abstergo's negligence in keeping dangerous prisoners alive is alarming. These individuals possess advanced combat skills, yet the facility allows them to roam freely, even possessing unguarded weapons such as smoke bombs and melee combat tools. This lack of basic security measures is not only impractical but dangerous, greatly impacting plot coherence.

Failed Subduing Techniques

Another flaw in Abstergo's handling of the situation involves their attempt to subdue these prisoners. Using batons instead of firearms is a tactic that is far too risky and unprepared. In any real world scenario, armed security would be employed to neutralize any threat effectively, making the choice of batons appear foolish and ineffective.

Lack of Safety Protocols

The most unforgivable oversight is the absence of a kill switch or any similar mechanism designed to quickly terminate operations should a breach occur. Such a system would have been a no-brainer for any security-minded organization, yet its absence highlights the movie's disregard for practicality and realism.

The "Death" Scene

Another unrealistic element is the portrayal of the protagonist's "death." At one point in the film, the character ingests a vial of poison, only for viewers to see the exact moment the substance enters his bloodstream. This clear visualization of the process raises questions about how this 'death' scene could be reconciled with the subsequent action sequences. Furthermore, the film doesn't adequately explain how the protagonist becomes conscious and is transported to the Animus facility after this event. A more plausible explanation for this crucial plot point could have significantly enhanced the overall narrative coherence.

The Leap of Faith

Perhaps the most audacious and unrealistic moment of the film is the leap of faith from the church spire. This scene has garnered significant controversy not just for its outlandish nature, but also for its failure to align with the character's abilities and the film's overall tone. A landscape architect who seemed to embody wisdom and caution, Jack Childers, suddenly makes an impulsive and unosesorial choice that defies both logic and character consistency. The camera lingers over the sky and clouds as if time has frozen, making the scene look even more surreal and disconnected from the narrative.

While this scene adds an element of spectacle, it detracts from the film's credibility and immersion. A more grounded approach could have grounded the character and the action sequences more effectively, maintaining the film's integrity.

In Assassin's Creed, every action and decision by the characters should seamlessly tie into the broader narrative. The 2016 adaptation occasionally falters in this aspect, as the aforementioned issues with Abstergo and the protagonist's death scene highlight. These shortcomings can be attributed to an overemphasis on action and over-the-top moments at the expense of consistent storytelling and character development.

As a Seoer from Google, it's essential to point out that these flaws are not only detrimental to the film's appeal but may also impact its searchable quality. Films rely on storytelling and character consistency to engage viewers and maintain engagement. When these elements are compromised, the film risks being remembered for its excessive plot holes rather than its core narrative.