A Quagmire of Loyalties: Bowers, Rafensperger, and the Complications of Partisan Allegiances

I was taken aback when I learned that Rusty Bowers and Brad Rafensperger stated they would vote for Donald Trump yet again. It's not as simple as a dedication to the man himself; it's a loyalty to the party. Yet, the true Republican ideals, not just any political aspirations, guide their decisions. But what's perplexing is the stark contrast between their initial support and their steadfast refusal to get directly involved in any actions to overturn the election results.

From Supporters to Detached Observers

This is a tale of two gentlemen, Bowers and Rafensperger, who were once vocal in their support of Trump, with their names infamously appearing on the ballot because they could not get off it. On November 3rd, they were eager to ensure Trump's re-election. Later, their true colors emerged, refusing to be directly involved in actions that would put them at legal risk. This decision reflects a significant shift from their initial enthusiasm to a more cautious and self-preservation-driven stance.

Morality and Motivation

Their loyalty to the party and their actions during the 2020 election results are intriguing. One could argue that they might have been happy to see Trump's electoral votes invalidated, but they chose not to take personal action that would make them legally responsible. This nuanced understanding of the situation is a testament to the complexity of their motivations. For the likes of Pence, Bowers, and Rafensperger, personal interests and a desire to avoid legal entanglements outweighed their initial support for the President.

The Role of Media and Public Recognition

The media hailed these men as courageous figures during the tumultuous days following the election. They rightfully lauded their bravery, acknowledging that their position gave them leverage to fend off threats. However, the situation was vastly different for individuals like Wandrea Shaye Moss, Ruby Freeman, and even a grandmother who faced relentless assaults without any protective resources. Such acts of vindictiveness, even if justified, are troubling, especially when they involve harming innocent people in pursuit of power.

The Ethical Implications

My moral compass suggests that no man guilty of such vindictiveness, regardless of whether he was wrongly accused or not, deserves a second chance at power. Freedom from personal vengeance is a fundamental requirement for any person, regardless of their status or position. If someone is willing to unleash vengeful and spiteful actions upon innocent bystanders to regain power, it undermines the very principles of democracy and governance. Such actions are not fit for an elective office, no matter how lowly.

His Supporters: Demeaned and Deserving?

It is disconcerting to see that Bowers and Rafensperger not only vote for Trump but even go as far as canvassing for him. Their decision to support a man capable of such destructive behavior speaks volumes about their moral compass. Given the stakes involved, one cannot help but question their judgment and integrity. Are they merely puppets in a larger political game, or do they genuinely believe in Trump's actions and values?

Conclusion

While Bowers and Rafensperger have shown a measure of courage by refraining from direct actions against election results, their continued loyalty to Trump raises numerous ethical questions. The true test of their character will be in their willingness to steer clear of such vengeful behaviors and upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the realm of politics. The journey from supporters to bystanders has come full circle, challenging the very essence of loyalty and morality.